visit us at be inspired pr
Inspired by This Wedding Debate: Destination Wedding Vs. Local Wedding
7 comments on this


Here we are again with another wedding debate!  Destination Vs. Local. There are pros and cons to both options – you might want a huge wedding with all of your friends you’ve known since the second grade, you might want to have a local wedding where everyone in a 50 mile radius can come. Or if you want a smaller intimate wedding with just the people that you are closest to and have a mini vacation out of it, you might want to have a destination wedding. (that’s what I did!) Below we have experts in the field weigh in on this great debate! Let us know what you think!

Jenn of Green Wedding Shoes Blog: In looking for weddings to feature on Green Wedding Shoes, I’d have to say that local weddings are typically my favorites. The couples usually put in lots more details and personality into their day which my readers love to see. Also, most of my readers are planning local weddings, so those help them find inspiration – although it’s fun to mix it up once in awhile and share a destination wedding :).

Kelly McWilliams of Weddings by Socialites: “Destination weddings are my favorite to plan for a few reasons. First, I love that a destination wedding allows for all the wedding guests to get to know each other before the wedding (typically at a welcome reception or other planned gathering).  When they have this time to meet and find out how they’re all connected, the ceremony somehow just feels so much more intimate and meaningful to everyone.  The reception in turn is even better because everyone is friends and experienced the ceremony as a group and not strangers.  Secondly, I love that when planning a destination wedding I’m planning events for people who are truly going to be ecstatic about getting a weekend away to a new place and that they get to celebrate with everyone they enjoy most.  I also love that with destination weddings we can break some of the traditional rules that just don’t work. That means we can make each event as unique as we like. Finally, I love being introduced to new locations and professionals.”

Jeff Hendlin of Bridal Guide Magazine: I am a big fan of destination weddings.  So are an increasingly number of engaged couples who are breaking from the traditional hometown weddings and opting to exchange their vows away from home.  The boom in destination weddings has also been recognized by hotel/resorts companies in exotic vacation destinations.  You’d be hard pressed to find a major resort in Mexico or the Caribbean today that don’t have well-staffed wedding departments.  Some have even created catchy titles for the heads of these departments like Chief Romance Officer and Director of Romance.

Jennifer Stein of Destination I Do Magazine: “Suffice it to say, I’m a HUGE cheerleader for destination weddings, I mean, we have an entire magazine devoted to the very subject! But to say they are “better” would be untrue. It totally depends on the couple and their situation. The reason I think destination weddings offer more is because they allow friends and loved ones to celebrate together with the bride and groom for longer than just several hours on the day of the wedding. Most weddings away give guests the unique opportunity to spend some serious quality time with one another in a fabulous vacation destination which, many times, maximizes the overall experience for everyone.Hometown weddings are the bedrock of our industry and give couples the traditional option so many feel more comfortable with. But for couples who are doing a hometown wedding…my advice would be to travel to an exceptional honeymoon destination to really live it up and start your new life together off right!”

Photo by Kira Sugarman Shemano

Photo by Anna Kuperberg

Photo by Boutwell Studio

Photo by Megan Ann Photography

Photo by Jose Villa

Photo by Shawna Herring

Photo by Rochelle Cheever


May you be inspired,

Leila

Inspired by This Head vs. Sweetheart Table Debate
12 comments on this


Because we got such great feedback on our Great Cake Debate post, we’ve decided to make our wedding debates an ongoing topic! Today’s debate is regarding tables: Head Table vs. Sweetheart. Head table being that you and your wedding party share a table, sweetheart table being that only you and your groom share one.  In my career in the wedding industry I have seen many great uses of both tables! Each contains pros and cons, but at the end of the day it’s up to the bride and groom to decide what suites them best.  Take a look at the expert opinions below and let us know which table option you prefer!

Carlie Renee of Gabriel Ryan Photography: Gabriel and i didn’t have either!  we had our bridal party sit with their spouses or families and we sat with our family. If I think about some of my favorite weddings, most of them had a head table… but a no fuss head table!!  Just something simple – nothing high off the ground or overly decorated. :)

Antonia Christianson of Antonia Christianson Events: To be honest, I’m not a super big fan of either. But if I had to choose one, I’d say sweetheart table. At a sweetheart table you have the ability to enjoy your spouse while still having the capability to get up, move around and greet guests without having to move around a large bridal party. Guests also have the opportunity to come up and speak to you one on one without blocking the view of your guests that are sitting at the head table with you.

Kathryn of Snippet and Ink: I prefer a head table, but only if it’s discreet – no tables on a raised stage, with people just on one side of the table like an expert panel. Just a table that’s like all the other tables, with the bridal party seated there.

Photo by Ryan Ray

Photo by Alison Conklin

Photo by Hugh Forte Photography

Photo by Erin Hearts Court

Photo by Jessica Johnston

Photo by Erin Hearts Court


May you be inspired,

Leila